Lenovo 90FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90FL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 364A
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 01:59
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 194
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 552
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 135
Parallax 115
100% 124 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 120
Splatting 101
88% 109 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 113 114 89 113 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 427
Write 402
Mixed 295
SusWrite 117
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 41.7
154% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 288
228% 319 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
893GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 182 161 186 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 189
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 182
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler C10 32GB
6GB free, PID 1641
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.4 7.1 7.4 7.1 7.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 7.2
10% 9.27 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1324 W642GU42J9266N8 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FL Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Lenovo 90FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback