Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 18:42
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 60.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 210
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 612
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.4% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 128
Parallax 120
99% 123 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 121
Splatting 101
86% 106 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1536 1167 793 783 796 802 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 1,823
Mixed 1525
SusWrite 980
356% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 72.7
234% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 560
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 510
380% 505 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 237%
Great: 346%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
52GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 167 375 212 202 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 396
Write 406
Mixed 295
SusWrite 260
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 35.1
119% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 69
128% 254 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 111%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 307 306 306 306 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 427
Mixed 386
SusWrite 322
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 49.5
162% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 200 189 158 150 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 436
Mixed 381
SusWrite 201
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 49.7
162% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
159GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 86 82 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 85.8
63% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
6GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 60 57 46 65 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 66.7
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 60.7
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-4GVKB 04CD F4-3466C16-4GVK 04CD F4-3200C16-4GVKB 04CD F4-3466C16-4GVK 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $864
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback