Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 08:32
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 175
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 266
32% 244 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.7% Poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 0.09
0% 30 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 68
70% 87.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZRZ-00HTKB0 500GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 31 35 32 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 110
Write 135
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 30.9
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E660 500GB
253GB free
Firmware: BG00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 66 57 78 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 87.8
Write 88.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 69.4
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R534G1601U1S Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D2V Builds (Compare 959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback