Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 09:44
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 850
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 80.9
39% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 108
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 99.5
6% 99.5 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
AMD(1002 010A) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.39 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 39 70 132 157 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 163
Write 174
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 108
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 1TB
17GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 21.1
Write 22.1
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 16.3
27% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
64GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 22.1
Write 22.3
Mixed 19
SusWrite 16.4
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-021.A00LF Micron V01D3L84GB52852813 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback