Asrock H310CM-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HG4  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 18:07
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 203
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 329
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ASRock(1849 3E90) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 4.06
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 0.14
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 0.09
1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD NTC 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ6AL3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 255 52 53 51 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 450
Write 287
Mixed 308
SusWrite 128
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 37.9
158% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 152
136% 201 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
10GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.3
10% 9.52 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
54% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H2666G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 11.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HG4 Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback