Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 06:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 73.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 306
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1159
104% 880 Pts
64-Core 2,163
134% 2,163 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 31.1
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 43.2
34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 103 118 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 134
Write 182
Mixed 159
SusWrite 113
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 35.3
129% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 103
90% 135 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 67%
SSD 1TB
137GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback