Asrock N68-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 16:56
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 39
2-Core 78
45% 66 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 107
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 59.8
55% 64.9 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 66.8
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 43 34 44 64 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 100
Write 86.7
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 47.9
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE 1TB
325GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.4 4.4 5.3 5.1 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 110
Write 5.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.9
23% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT351E6CFR8C-H9 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 6GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VGS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback