Asrock N68-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 75.2
45% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 145
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 63
63% 72.2 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 68
Splatting 62.7
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 635 480GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 166 168 169 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 134
Write 164
Mixed 146
SusWrite 165
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 28.3
96% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 36.2
31% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
87GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 67 65 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 69.5
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 69.7
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.6 4.7 4 4.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 6.8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.6
11% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT351E6CFR8C-H9 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 6GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 2% 60 66 53 60 0.7" 1024 768 LTM0000 HDMI TO VGA
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B
Typical N68-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VGS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback