Medionpc MS-7502

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedionpc MS-7502  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7502
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 14:52
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$59
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 73.1
35% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 80.6
8-Core 80
11% 80.3 Pts
64-Core 64.4
4% 64.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20.2
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
138GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 139 85 84 86 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.4% Above average
Read 234
Write 206
Mixed 196
SusWrite 118
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 27.8
100% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 148
121% 171 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 91%
MD07500-NSDW-RO 750GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 36 40 37 36 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 46
Write 61.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 32.5
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7502 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7502

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback