Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 16:30
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 191
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 372
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 40.7
28% 35 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 35.7
26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 216
Write 205
Mixed 211
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 10
51% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 94.5
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.9
14% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
138GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 107 125 103 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 126
Write 132
Mixed 30
SusWrite 108
72% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-012.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback