Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '17 at 20:50
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 178
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 441
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2682) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 38
Parallax 49.9
31% 42.1 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 35.4
35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
15GB free
Firmware: MU03
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 335
Write 137
Mixed 186
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 23.9
93% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 99.6
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 28.2
45% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 77%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 280
Write 92.7
Mixed 146
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 14.4
72% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 38.5
51% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 82%
WD %s,t FILEIO 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
Read 42
Write 51.1
Mixed 38.7
33% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.18
35% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 27%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$63
142GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 128
Write 108
Mixed 115
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2.85
4K Mixed 0.24
97% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
141GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 27.4
67% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 2.59
4K Mixed 0.34
139% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
22GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.68% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 17.3
Mixed 16.1
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.05
3% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $552
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback