Today's hottest deals

Asus P6TD DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6TD DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory40.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 02:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 151
58% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 345
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
Asus(1043 84B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 78.6
48% 68.7 fps
MRender 76.7
Gravity 69
Splatting 56.6
54% 67.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTGAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 87 76 51 64 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 232
Write 215
Mixed 218
SusWrite 78.7
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 28.1
91% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 40.7
34% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 96%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 128GB
27GB free
Firmware: HTGAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 82 91 82 102 84 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 182
Write 65.1
Mixed 119
SusWrite 92.9
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 19.4
60% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 26.5
25% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 96%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$78
26GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 88 77 59 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 229
Write 213
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 82.9
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 30.2
100% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 70.4
DQ Mixed 39.1
33% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 6 slots used
48GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6TD DELUXE Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6TD DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback