Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory42.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 03:20
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$98
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 249
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 720
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 1066) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1836 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 89.4
52% 76.8 fps
MRender 87.2
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 65.2
61% 75.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 483 487 486 178 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 490
Mixed 447
SusWrite 364
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 51.9
173% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
222GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 268 269 268 268 269 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 445
Write 274
Mixed 319
SusWrite 269
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 36.5
134% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 187
167% 252 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73% Very good
Read 160
Write 172
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 94.9
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905471-074.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905471-074.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 38
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 5R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 35% 31 349 288 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI2725 ASUS VG278HE
Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback