Dell Latitude E6510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0N5KHN
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '17 at 02:03
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 108
58% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 205
24% 189 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 150
Write 200
Mixed 171
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 7.14
42% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 11.1
15% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ41UF8BDU5-GN-F 02FE EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6510 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback