HP ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 859C
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 13:01
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 674
69% 557 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 859C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.72
6% 8.65 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 14.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 418 419 421 467 421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,116
Write 1,156
Mixed 939
SusWrite 434
204% 911 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 53.1
176% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 709
588% 840 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 166%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 24.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback