Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77DF
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130513
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 86
2-Core 165
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 405
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$170
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 106
Parallax 99.7
77% 100 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 88.3
Splatting 93
75% 90.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 351 270 279 279 278 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 427
Mixed 416
SusWrite 313
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 43.5
144% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 364
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 129%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
142GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 36 37 41 39 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 99.4
Write 86.9
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 40.4
102% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 65%
WDC WD40 02FYYZ-01B7CB0 4TB
117GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 71 73 81 77 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
Read 104
Write 116
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 79.2
122% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 75%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
187GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 14 16 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 66.8
Write 69.8
Mixed 64
SusWrite 17.2
72% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback