Sapphire PURE WHITE A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardSapphire PURE WHITE A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 05:32
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 87.5
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 104
53% 81 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 182
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 39.2
31% 39.7 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 28
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer A S340 120GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 89 115 67 50 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 396
Write 338
Mixed 182
SusWrite 86.8
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 29.6
98% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 166
144% 212 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-059.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 2.1
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback