Asus H61M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-A (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '21 at 22:01
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 390 53% 393 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 42.2 Parallax 39.2 31% 39.9 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 28 28% 35 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$25 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900KB3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 226 234 235 236 236 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.7% Good	Read 250 Write 231 Mixed 218 SusWrite 224 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 27.6 96% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 121 104% 150 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 465GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 89 88 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 90.2 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 89.2 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5402-059.A00LF 2x2GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 9: 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
9%	43%	7	110	6	60	18.5"	1366 768	BNQ784E BenQ G922HDL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-A Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	37x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	30x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	22x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	39x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	23x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 12GBUnknownBench 39%, 24 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	8x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16