Dell Latitude E6420

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6420  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0P6K8J
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 01:42
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 107
51% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 161
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 0493) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 168 96 89 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 399
Write 335
Mixed 296
SusWrite 143
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 2.4
25% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 116
126% 212 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 88%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 80GB
52GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 26 25 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 19
Mixed 14
SusWrite 23.7
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 830B NT4GC64C88B1NS-DI 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6420 Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback