Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190123
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 16:50
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 600
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1042) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 374 387 388 282 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 398
Mixed 388
SusWrite 339
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 41.5
146% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 256
212% 305 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8ET 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 23.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback