Monster ABRA A5 V15.4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V15.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V15.4
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 18:21
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 176
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 612
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.8
8% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 442 407 405 402 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,646
Write 1,388
Mixed 1,109
SusWrite 417
254% 1,140 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 50.6
163% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 539
405% 548 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 167%
Great: 261%
SPCCSolidStateDisk 512GB
98GB free
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 159 161 256 169 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 188
Write 99.3
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 198
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 6.6
38% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 22.4
18% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 84%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
143GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1312 341 36 36 36 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 941
Write 1,488
Mixed 776
SusWrite 301
198% 877 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 567
421% 561 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 120%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8ET 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.8
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 25 60 15.5" 1536 793 LGD05E5
Typical ABRA A5 V15.4 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V15.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $158Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback