Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory25 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 19:32
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 176
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 570
53% 443 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 66 67 67 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 112
SusWrite 68.1
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 20.3
86% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 31.9
DQ Mixed 21.9
19% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 189GB
171GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 57 59 57 56 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 121
Write 123
Mixed 123
SusWrite 59
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 21.7
70% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 32.7
24% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 28GB
null MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 71.6
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 29.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback