Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-865
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 22:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 252
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 754
78% 627 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40% Below average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 50.4
Parallax 49.7
42% 50.6 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 43.6
36% 43.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 726 738 744 743 733 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1142
Write 1152
Mixed 1,168
SusWrite 752
237% 1,054 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 61.1
206% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,077
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,064
786% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 201%
Great: 213%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 218 220 220 219 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 172
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 216
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
251% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB
74GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.93% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 17.9
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 18.8
25% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.1
64% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Kingston KHX2666C16/16G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback