Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 53%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 07:00
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 98.2
51% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 237
25% 202 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 4.8
4% 23.7 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 325 296 386 349 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 772
Write 842
Mixed 1,027
SusWrite 360
169% 750 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 35.2
127% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 457
327% 421 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 213%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
357GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 102 100 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 97.7
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 101
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 12,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback