Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 20:04
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 385
44% 341 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 50.1
46% 56 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 47.4
38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 254 232 159 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 611
Write 260
Mixed 292
SusWrite 187
74% 337 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 25.3
103% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 302
234% 322 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 12,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback