Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 02:38
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Memory 24.6
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 38.3
17% 27.5 Pts
4-Core 39.4
8-Core 35.8
5% 37.6 Pts
64-Core 36.3
2% 36.3 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.5
0% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 44 48 43 47 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 30.7
Write 53.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 45.7
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 3GB
667, 800 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 288
14% 288 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback