Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD4H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 21:43
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$54
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 99.1
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 199
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 286
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 128
Parallax 120
95% 121 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 126
Splatting 110
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 342 389 400 404 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 366
Mixed 336
SusWrite 369
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 38.9
120% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 359
267% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
372GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 350 393 405 408 406 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 426
Mixed 404
SusWrite 374
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 48.2
159% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$70
612GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 136 134 132 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 133
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 40.3
99% 40.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback