Today's hottest deals

Quanta TW9/SW9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQuanta TW9/SW9  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100809
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 22:00
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 89.5
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 90.6
54% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 188
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Quanta(152D 0831) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MJA2320BH G2 320GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.7 4 4.7 1.4 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 35.7
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 3.4
15% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1110 3TB
1TB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 22.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 23.9
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S2G64CB88B5N-CG 99U5428-049.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Quanta TW9/SW9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback