Today's hottest deals

Quanta TW9/SW9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQuanta TW9/SW9  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100809
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 88.5
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 87.3
50% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 197
21% 169 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Quanta(152D 0831) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 1.5
3% 1.87 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
67GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 25 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 20
Write 22.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 25
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 97%
Fujitsu MJA2320BH G2 320GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 6.8 3.6 2 1.7 2.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 72.2
Write 56.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 5.5
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S2G64CB88B5N-CG 99U5428-049.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Quanta TW9/SW9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback