Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E7240

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E7240  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R6F3F
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 11:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 88.5
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 98.8
60% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 204
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 4.7
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT49D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 97 89 92 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.5% Poor
Read 207
Write 135
Mixed 141
SusWrite 89.1
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 7
30% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 52
DQ Mixed 75.3
46% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 83%
asmedia ASM1053 1TB
460GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 35 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 13.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 33.7
34% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7240 Builds (Compare 1,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback