Today's hottest deals

Asus X750JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X750JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X750JB
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130524
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 08:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 489
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 122D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.8
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
583GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 390 421 391 398 391 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 426
Mixed 405
SusWrite 396
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 45
147% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 304
243% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X750JB Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X750JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback