Gigabyte GA-Gaming B8-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Gaming B8
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Gaming B8-CF  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '17 at 06:03
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 774
79% 637 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 191
Parallax 169
139% 177 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 163
Splatting 121
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 519
Write 349
Mixed 508
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 12.9
107% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 12.9
28% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
676GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 168
Mixed 143
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.32
104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Gaming B8-CF Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Gaming B8-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback