Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac19,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit색, 5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 08:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 720
75% 601 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0195) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 82.8
48% 65.4 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 40.5
42% 53.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$98
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1454 1384 1380 1298 1269 1372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,175
Write 1,129
Mixed 1,166
SusWrite 1,360
273% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 32.8
100% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 1,014
718% 912 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 200%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 29
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Apple iMac19,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback