Apple MacBookPro13,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro13,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-A5C67F76ED83108C
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 13:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 468
54% 423 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Device(BDBD A14C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.4% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 80.4
47% 64.5 fps
MRender 54.9
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 41.2
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256L 251GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS6AA0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1555
Write 1,394
Mixed 915
286% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 26.2
89% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 701
516% 693 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro13,3 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro13,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback