MSI MS-1773

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS70 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1773  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 17:23
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 190
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 542
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1103) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 7.2
3% 18.5 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 6.6
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SMS100S3128GD 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 163 4.1 122 220 225 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 443
Write 122
Mixed 218
SusWrite 157
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 17.3
92% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 62.1
84% 152 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 74%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
209GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 120 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 83.3
Write 77.2
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 119
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1773 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1773

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback