Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-56

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-56  (all builds)
MotherboardWL Strongbow_WL
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181031
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 10:41
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 497
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Acer(1025 1300) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 7.5
6% 6.6 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 465
Write 178
Mixed 249
65% 297 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 14.9
62% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 296
227% 311 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 8GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-56 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback