Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-54  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Strongbow_KL
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 23:53
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 424
48% 378 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1269) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.72
6% 8.32 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 14.1
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 348 325 160 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 348
Write 360
Mixed 293
SusWrite 248
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 33.1
110% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 304
219% 280 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.8
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-54 Builds (Compare 346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback