Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 66.4
45% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 83.5
8-Core 82.7
11% 83.1 Pts
64-Core 84.6
5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 90.8
49% 70.8 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 46.2
45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
66GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 61 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 70.2
Write 71.1
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 62.1
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38%
Great: 43%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 92 95 74 73 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 73
Write 116
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 84.7
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
105% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback