Today's hottest deals

MSI A68HM-P33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-P33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141215
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 10:17
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Memory 35.1
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 61.8
27% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 72.2
8-Core 68.3
10% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 57.3
4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
MSI(1462 7721) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$63
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 68 50 50 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 358
Write 143
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 63.5
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 21.3
82% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 75.3
66% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
267GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 147 152 148 142 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 149
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-P33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-P33 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback