Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 16:47
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 80.2
44% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 66.1
8-Core 84.3
10% 75.2 Pts
64-Core 71.1
4% 71.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1007
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easys tore 240GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EF43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 113 117 122 128 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 405
Write 329
Mixed 286
SusWrite 140
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 15.2
71% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 35.6
47% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
20% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback