Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120926
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 16:34
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 31
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 89.3
34% 60 Pts
4-Core 82.2
8-Core 89.9
11% 86.1 Pts
64-Core 87.4
5% 87.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 1850) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2.3
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 74 66 61 59 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 40
Write 72.5
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 65.1
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
K A 9 H H S M 6GB
667, 667, 533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback