bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC7i3BNB
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 22:20
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 98.4
48% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 169
17% 139 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3095
Write 27.4
Mixed 53.4
220% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 386
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 3.8
591% 130 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 130 131 131 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 132
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70%
Great: 67%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59
Write 80.7
Mixed 63.9
91% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.4
184% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 74%
ST10000N E0008-2JM101 10TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 158
Write 156
Mixed 168
208% 161 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.4
294% 9.53 MB/s
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
95GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,370
Write 21.2
Mixed 49.2
777% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 354
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3
1,472% 120 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 74%
ST10000D M0004-2GR11L 10TB
16GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 87 84 86 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 101
Write 188
Mixed 241
SusWrite 86.2
224% 154 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 79%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 163 168 197 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 148
SusWrite 183
208% 149 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 3.4
289% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-008.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 11.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback