Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171017
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 14:02
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 211
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 400
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 7.2
5% 7.9 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 0.1
5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 44 54 41 62 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 268
Write 330
Mixed 176
SusWrite 58.9
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 19.3
50% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 126
137% 230 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 244%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
572GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 101 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 76.2
Write 85
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 99.2
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143SB1-CRC 859B CT4G4SFS824A.M8FE 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 24.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 7,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback