Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 15:10
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 81.9
43% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 197
21% 168 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 8.2
6% 15.6 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 832 138 103 105 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1727
Write 890
Mixed 812
SusWrite 349
208% 945 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 34.9
119% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 402
269% 317 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 140%
Great: 244%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
228GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 83 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 51
Write 87.2
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 83
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
110% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR26S19S8/8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback