Huanan Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 00:42
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 89
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 630
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 1,269
78% 1,269 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 130
Parallax 147
92% 130 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 91.1
80% 98.8 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN512NVMe-M.2/80 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 348 353 349 423 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 730
Write 582
Mixed 469
SusWrite 350
119% 533 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 25.3
86% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 406
280% 337 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 245%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 189 189 186 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 206
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 188
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 109%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback