Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
Motherboard X99-D3
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 06:26
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 184
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 726
64% 546 Pts
64-Core 1,471
91% 1,471 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 37.5
28% 37.3 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zns256g NVMe KIOXIA 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10410105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1174 731 397 399 408 410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 1,458
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 586
260% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 63.7
204% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 565
412% 543 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 176%
Great: 219%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
931GB free
Firmware: A7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 356 360 369 354 367 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 53.1
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 39.3
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 20.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 115%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback