Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '20 at 08:31
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0 1,039 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 126 56% 90.5 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 364 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34D5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.6 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 240GB SSD 240GB 3,846 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 254 216 215 211 212 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 193 Write 312 Mixed 213 SusWrite 235 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 29.7 94% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 80.4 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 73.5 64% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70DMB- 1x16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 660 samples	38x
36JSZF51272PZ 2x4GBMicronBench 46%, 364 samples	36x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	33x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $107