Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 19:30
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 112
49% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 336
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 29.2
26% 34.6 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 27.2
27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 69 37 21 36 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 232
Write 193
Mixed 19
SusWrite 62.4
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 2.3
33% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 2.5
DQ Mixed 0.2
18% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB
314GB free
Firmware: GJ003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 57.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 69.2
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70DMB- 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback