Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B85
Motherboard	MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200610
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '20 at 17:49
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 121 49% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 538 45% 391 Pts	64-Core 1,101 68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3726) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 158 Parallax 178 118% 160 fps	MRender 173 Gravity 142 Splatting 119 116% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 469 Write 432 Mixed 428 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 45.1 145% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 294 220% 291 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 81.2 Write 87.5 Mixed 21.7 46% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB 1,239 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 169GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 37.7 Write 35.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 36.8 25% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 101%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 186GB free Firmware: AX101U SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 80.2 Write 79.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 81.2 49% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 32GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.6% Good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 24.3 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 16.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	326x
RX 5700-XTAMD $150Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	280x
RTX 2060Nvidia $269Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	273x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	154x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	146x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	255x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	236x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	187x

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $589