Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory15.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 22:05
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 126
58% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 353
34% 282 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 140
Parallax 129
105% 133 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 136
Splatting 121
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$245
255GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 283 369 403 415 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 428
Write 356
Mixed 301
SusWrite 369
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 35.6
118% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 32.6
DQ Mixed 82.2
77% 126 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 398
Mixed 320
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 40.6
129% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 175
152% 225 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
87GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 263 297 309 309 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 397
Mixed 363
SusWrite 300
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 44.8
146% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 258
194% 260 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Xtreem-LV-2666 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback